R. v. Almarales, 2008 ONCA 692
[97] The trial judge did not have the benefit of the decision in R. v. McNeil (2006), 2006 CanLII 33663 (ON CA), 213 C.C.C. (3d) 365 (Ont. C.A.), which emphasizes the need for a permanent record of written materials discussed with counsel and provided to jurors, to permit meaningful appellate review. In light of McNeil, it is absolutely essential that draft instructions discussed with counsel, written final instructions and deliberation aids, be filed as lettered exhibits and made part of the trial record to permit meaningful appellate review.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire