Rechercher sur ce blogue

lundi 24 février 2025

Liste non-exhaustive de facteurs permettant d'apprécier la qualification d'un expert

R. v. Pham, 2013 ONSC 4903

Lien vers la décision


[31]         In summary, the following non-exhaustive list of factors assist in determining whether a tendered expert witness is qualified:

                     the manner in which the witness acquired the special skill and knowledge upon which the application is based;

                     the witness' formal education (i.e. degrees or certificates);

                     the witness' professional qualifications (i.e. a member of the College of Physicians and Surgeons);

                     the witness' membership and participation in professional associations related to his or her proposed evidence;

                     whether the witness has attended additional courses or seminars related to the areas of evidence in dispute;

                     the witness’ experience in the proposed area(s);

                     whether the witness has taught or written in the proposed area(s);

                     whether, after achieving a level of expertise, the witness has kept up with the literature in the field;

                     whether the witness has previously been qualified to give evidence in the proposed area(s), including the number of times and whether the previous evidence was contested;

                     whether the witness has not been qualified to give evidence in the proposed area(s) and if so, the reason(s) why; and

                     whether previous caselaw or legal texts have identified the contested area as a proper area for expert evidence and if so, who might give the evidence.

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

Le dédommagement à la victime doit toujours être envisagé lors de la détermination de la peine

La transmission de l'argumentaire de la partie adverse à un témoin clé aux fins de la préparation de son témoignage est à éviter, surtout si elle met en relief des attaques à sa crédibilité, mais elle n'est pas absolument interdite

R. v. Paris, 2006 CanLII 11655 (ON CA) Lien vers la décision [ 24 ]           Lastly it has been argued that Christensen’s affidavit should ...