Festing v. Canada (Attorney General), 2003 BCCA 112 (CanLII)
Lien vers la décision
[24] In the result, we agree with counsel that the Lavallee guidelines should apply to searches of places which may not fall within the traditional concept of a law office. After considering a variety of wording suggested by counsel, we conclude that the words "law office" should be interpreted for the purpose of applying the Lavallee guidelines as including: "any place where privileged documents may reasonably be expected to be located". This definition would include, for example, a lawyer's home, a lawyer's office in multi-disciplinary business premises; the office of in-house counsel for a business, and storage facilities where lawyers store their files. The Court offers these examples as just that — examples of places where the Lavallee guidelines would apply. Counsel agree that there is little utility in attempting to define all such places since the practice of law, and the manner in which lawyers' store client information (for example, on computer hard drives and disks), continue to expand and diversify.
[25] Although counsel suggested that the protection of solicitor-client privilege should attach to "materials" and not simply "documents", we have concluded that the word "documents" is appropriate. "Documents" is the word used in the Lavallee guidelines. Further, the word "document" was given an expansive definition in s. 488.1(1) (as it then was) by reference to s. 321 of the Code which provides, in part:
"document" means any paper, parchment or other material on which is recorded or marked anything that is capable of being read or understood by a person, computer system or other device, and includes a credit card, but does not include trade marks on articles of commerce or inscriptions on stone or metal or other like material;
We would adopt that definition of "document" as applying in our expanded definition of the words "law office" for the purpose of applying the Lavallee guidelines
Rechercher sur ce blogue
S'abonner à :
Publier des commentaires (Atom)
Le dédommagement à la victime doit toujours être envisagé lors de la détermination de la peine
Une lecture fragmentaire de la preuve peut constituer une erreur de droit
R. c. Beaudin, 2022 QCCA 1516 Lien vers la décision [ 50 ] Le juge devait se garder de morceler ainsi la preuve en analysant séparéme...
-
Marcotte c. R., 2017 QCCS 62 (CanLII) Lien vers la décision [ 32 ] Les motifs raisonnables de croire sont définis comme étant ...
-
R. c. Cénac, 2015 QCCQ 3719 (CanLII) Lien vers la décision Tableau de SENTENCES en matière de FRAUDE DE PLUS DE 5 000$ Art. 3...
-
R. c. Sainte-Luce, 2009 QCCQ 5196 (CanLII) [73] Je ne suis pas d'accord. La position de la poursuite est contraire à la juris...
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire