R. c. Nault, 1988 CanLII 1353 (QC CA)
Similarly, the attention paid to the victim prior to the loan and his distancing himself from her afterwards may have been normal and innocent. The trial judge had the right, however, to take into account the conduct of the accused both before and after the transaction when deciding whether there was dishonesty on his part.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire