Rechercher sur ce blogue

mercredi 7 janvier 2015

Série de facteurs pertinents à l'analyse du risque réaliste de danger en matière d'infraction de garde et contrôle

Roy c. R., 2014 QCCS 6240 (CanLII)


[49]        Dans l'affaire Fisher, émanant de l'Alberta, une série de facteurs pertinents à l'analyse du risque réaliste de danger sont énoncés :
[28] Durno J. in R. v. Szymanski2009 CanLII 45328 (ON SC), [2009] OJ No 362388 MVR (5th) 182 (Ont.S.C.J.) [Szymanski], noted that it was difficult to define what evidence would establish or refute the creation of a realistic risk. After examining the jurisprudence, Durno J. provided a non-exhaustive list of factors that a court might look at when determining if a real risk had arisen (at paragraph 93). These factors were cited with approval by the Court in Smits, supra, at paragraph 63:
(a) The level of impairment, which is relevant to the likelihood of exercising bad judgment and the time it would take for the accused to become fit to drive;
(b) Whether the keys were in the ignition or readily available to be placed in the ignition;
(c) Whether the vehicle was running;
(d) The location of the vehicle;
(e) Whether the accused had reached his or her destination or if the accused was still required to travel to his or her destination;
(f) The accused’s disposition and attitude;
(g) Whether the accused drove the vehicle to the location where it was found;
(h) Whether the accused started driving after drinking and pulled over to “sleep it off” or started using the vehicle for purposes other than driving;
(i) Whether the accused had a plan to get home that did not involve driving while impaired or over the legal limit;
(j) Whether the accused had a stated intention to resume driving;
(k) Whether the accused was seated in the driver’s seat regardless of the applicability of the presumption;
(l) Whether the accused was wearing his or her seatbelt;
(m) Whether the accused failed to take advantage of alternate means of leaving the scene;
(n) Whether the accused had a cell phone with which to make other arrangements and failed to do so.

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

Le dédommagement à la victime doit toujours être envisagé lors de la détermination de la peine

Le juge agissant en révision d'une autorisation judiciaire peut tirer des inférences de l'affidavit

Laguerre c. R. 2022 QCCA 1548 Lien vers la décision [ 24 ]        La juge réviseure devait plutôt s’en tenir à décider si l’autorisation rec...