Rechercher sur ce blogue

mercredi 6 juin 2012

Autre illustration jurisprudentielle que l'infraction de possession n'est pas moindre et incluse à celle de trafic

R. v. Vickers, 2004 ABQB 311 (CanLII)

Lien vers la décision

[19] The New Brunswick Supreme Court Appeal Division in Drysdelle concluded that where the charge is that of selling, a species of trafficking, the same conclusion as reached in Shewfelt must be reached in their case, and they held that the trial judge had no jurisdiction to convict the accused of possession as that charge was not laid. They then allowed the Crown’s appeal on the basis that while the evidence might have disclosed the offence of possession, possession was not an included offence since the count charged trafficking simpliciter.

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

Le dédommagement à la victime doit toujours être envisagé lors de la détermination de la peine

Il est adéquat pour un juge d'instance de tirer l'inférence que l'accusé a la mens rea nécessaire à la commission de l'infraction lorsque l'ensemble de la preuve est prise en compte

R v Kaiswatum, 2019 SKCA 7  Lien vers la décision [ 53 ]             The sole issue at the trial was whether the Crown had proven the necess...