L'impatience du juge VS la partialité

Carrier c. R., 2012 QCCA 594 (CanLII)

Lien vers la décision

[5]               Dans l'arrêt Kelley v. Palazzo la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario écrit au paragr. 21 :

[21] It takes much more than a demonstration of judicial impatience with counsel or even downright rudeness to dispel the strong presumption of impartiality. While litigants may not appreciate that presumption and thus may misread judicial conduct, lawyers are expected to appreciate that presumption and, where necessary, explain it to their clients. Baseless allegations of bias or of a reasonable apprehension of bias founded on a perceived slight of discourtesy that occurred during a trial, will not assist the client's cause and do a disservice to the administration of justice.