R. v. Powell, 2021 ONCA 271
[68] This, in my view, was a proper use of both statements and in no way infringed their Charter right to remain silent. Essentially, all the trial judge was saying was that the appellants chose to speak, as was their right, and in speaking, they lied to police. That is a factor that he could and should consider in assessing their credibility. After all, a right to silence is not a right to lie without impunity.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire