R v Magomadova, 2015 ABCA 26
[48] When an accused raises claims of physical and/or mental impairment, any claim for a stay of proceedings could in principle fall under either or both categories depending on the specific facts. Where an accused claims that the process of being subjected to a trial would significantly threaten their life or health, the most obvious category is the residual one. That is, while the trial itself may be procedurally fair (the accused can adequately instruct counsel, etc.), it would nonetheless be unconscionable for state action in the form of a trial to be responsible for threatening a person’s life.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire