R. v. Campeau, 2009 SKCA 4
[21] To obtain a conviction on a s. 348(1)(b) charge, the Crown had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements: (i) the identity of the accused as the offender; (ii) the time and place set forth in the indictment; (iii) the accused broke and entered the place identified in the indictment; (iv) the accused intended to break and enter the place identified in the indictment; and, (v) the accused committed the indictable offence specified in the indictment at the referenced place. Although the first four elements of a s. 348(1)(a) offence are identical to those for a s. 348(1)(b) offence, its fifth element differs to the extent it only requires that the accused have an intention to commit an indictable offence, while the fifth element of a s. 348(1)(b) offence requires the accused to have committed the indictable offence specified in the indictment, in this case an assault.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire