Rechercher sur ce blogue

mercredi 8 octobre 2025

Les éléments constitutifs de l'infraction d'introduction par effraction

R. v. Campeau, 2009 SKCA 4

Lien vers la décision


[21]  To obtain a conviction on a s. 348(1)(b) charge, the Crown had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements: (i) the identity of the accused as the offender; (ii) the time and place set forth in the indictment; (iii) the accused broke and entered the place identified in the indictment; (iv) the accused intended to break and enter the place identified in the indictment; and, (v) the accused committed the indictable offence specified in the indictment at the referenced place. Although the first four elements of a s. 348(1)(a) offence are identical to those for a s. 348(1)(b) offence, its fifth element differs to the extent it only requires that the accused have an intention to commit an indictable offence, while the fifth element of a s. 348(1)(b) offence requires the accused to have committed the indictable offence specified in the indictment, in this case an assault.

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

Le dédommagement à la victime doit toujours être envisagé lors de la détermination de la peine

Les limites de l'interventionnisme judiciaire : comment l'usurpation du rôle d'avocat par le juge détruit l'apparence d'équité d'un procès selon le critère de l'observateur raisonnable

R. v. Stucky, 2009 ONCA 151 Lien vers la décision 1)        The role of a trial judge [ 61 ]           The role of a trial judge is often ve...