R. v. Cyr, 2012 ONCA 919
[100] Evidence that a call from a cell phone is likely to register at the tower closest to the caller is evidence of fact, not of opinion: R. v. Hamilton, 2011 ONCA 399, 271 C.C.C. (3d) 208, at paras. 259, 277, and 279. This evidence is subject to limitations: it does not disclose the exact or precise location of a caller, only the general area from which the call originated. More precise evidence may require expert opinion: Hamilton, at para. 280; R. v. Ranger, 2010 ONCA 759, [2010] O.J. No. 4840, at para. 17.
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire