R v Brar, 2020 ABCA 398
[24] Whether the trial judge articulated the correct legal criteria for admissibility of the video stills and DVD surveillance videos is a question of law, reviewed for correctness. The factual findings made by the trial judge, and whether those facts met that legal criteria are questions of mixed fact and law, reviewed on a standard of palpable and overriding error: R v Bulldog, 2015 ABCA 251 at para 17, 606 AR 261 [Bulldog].
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire